Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211980›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A comprehensive review and evaluation of species richness estimation.

Johanna Elena Schmitz, Sven Rahmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johanna Elena SchmitzAlgorithmic Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics Saar, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-6377-2561
Sven RahmannAlgorithmic Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics Saar, Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8536-6065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe statistical problem of estimating the total number of distinct species in a population (or distinct elements in a multiset), given only a small sample, occurs in various areas, ranging from the unseen species problem in ecology to estimating the diversity of immune repertoires. Accurately estimating the true richness from very small samples is challenging, in particular for highly diverse populations with many rare species. Depending on the application, different estimation strategies have been proposed that incorporate explicit or implicit assumptions about either the species distribution or about the sampling process. These methods are scattered across the literature, and an extensive overview of their assumptions, methodology, and performance is currently lacking.

resultsWe comprehensively review and evaluate a variety of existing methods on real and simulated data with different compositions of rare and abundant species. Our evaluation shows that, depending on species composition, different methods provide the most accurate richness estimates. Simple methods based on the observed number of singletons yield accurate asymptotic lower bounds for several of the tested simulated species compositions, but tend to underestimate the true richness for heterogeneous populations and small samples containing 1% to 5% of the population. When the population size is known, upsampling (extrapolating) estimators such as PreSeq and RichnEst yield accurate estimates of the total species richness in a sample that is up to 10 times larger than the observed sample. AVAILABILITY: Source code for data simulation and richness estimation is available at https://gitlab.com/rahmannlab/speciesrichness.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer Simulationcomparative evaluationdiversity estimationimmune repertoiremicrobiomespecies richnessupsampling

Identifiers

PMID40211980
PMCPMC11986355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.