ArticleAnnals of surgery2026
Automatic Generation of Liver Virtual Models With Artificial Intelligence: Application to Liver Resection Complexity Prediction.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic hepatectomy for benign liver disease: single-centre consecutive series and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive and open approaches.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Seeing the invisible: Three-dimensional liver modeling from simulation to the scalpel.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Review
- A Multi-center Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI Dataset with Expert Annotations and clinicopathological data.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- From prediction to practice: artificial intelligence as an enabling layer in liver transplant care - reflections on ILTS 2025.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe clinical aim of this work is to predict intraoperative LRC from preoperative CT scans only.
backgroundLiver resection (LR) is the most prevalent curative treatment for primary liver cancer, yet overall mortality/morbidity rates remain elevated. The conventional definition and classification of LR complexity (LRC) lack the inclusion of the disease-induced 3D anatomic surgery complexity.
methods3D models of the organ, tumors, and blood vessels were generated from deep learning models trained on patients' CT scans. The surgeons' expertise on which anatomic factors lead to LRC was translated into a new anatomic frame of reference around the Hepatic Central Zone (HCZ). A fully automatic pipeline to generate the HCZ and quantify the tumor position relative to it was assessed. An AI model was then trained to predict LRC from a patient cohort for whom LRC was annotated at the end of each surgery. The AI prediction was finally compared to the prediction of surgeons who only saw the patient's preoperative CT scan.
resultsThe 3D reconstructions are successfully evaluated on benchmark data sets. The HCZ is accurately generated for a variety of atypical vascular anatomies (dice score 82±4.6%). The automatic pipeline is successfully run on a 145 HCC patient cohort. The predicted LRC outperforms the surgeons' individual and combined anticipated complexities (accuracy and AUC scores: 79.4±3.4% and 85.1±3.2%, respectively).
conclusionsThis automatic digital tool accurately predicts intraoperative LRC and paves the way for an innovative oncology surgery planning. This tool could help orient patients toward appropriate medical centers depending on the predicted LRC level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.