Observational studyGut and liver2025
A Prospective Study on the Detection of Gastric Neoplasms Using Pepsinogen and Gastrin-17 Levels.
Observational study in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05883345 (Validation of Blood Test Finding for the Diagnosis of Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validation of Blood Test Finding for the Diagnosis of Gastritis and Gastric Neoplasms
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pepsinogen Assay Findings in Individuals With Gastric Atrophy and Intestinal Metaplasia.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer: Blood Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsy, Artificial Intelligence, and Risk-Stratified Care.Cancers · 2026Review
- The Role of Serum Pepsinogen Tests for Detecting Gastric Cancer Between Sexes and Among Age Groups.Gut and liver · 2026Review
- Differential impacts of Helicobacter pylori antibody typing on gastric secretory function: a cross-sectional study based on serum biomarkers.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- What Is the Easiest Way to Diagnose Advanced-Stage Autoimmune Gastritis in the Korean Context?Gut and liver · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: GastroPanel tests include gastrin-17 (G-17) levels in addition to pepsinogen (PG) and Methods: Consecutive individuals who underwent serological testing were included from May 2023 to August 2024. Foreigners and those with gastrectomy, renal insufficiency, previous Results: Among the 1,101 participants, 122 were diagnosed with gastric neoplasms. High G-17 levels (odds ratio [OR], 1.030; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.008 to 1.052), low I/II ratios determined by GastroPanel tests (OR, 0.834; 95% CI, 0.779 to 0.894), and low I/II ratios determined by HBI PG assays (OR, 0.584; 95% CI, 0.511 to 0.668) were significant variables for detecting gastric neoplasms. The cutoff values for low I/II ratios were <6.15 (GastroPanel test) and <3.005 (HBI assay), with no differences in diagnostic performance between the two tests (p=0.085). Although the I/II ratio alone was a significant independent variable for detecting early gastric cancers, advanced gastric cancers, adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors, the G-17 level alone was significant only for adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. The findings of the patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors did not differ from those of the controls. Conclusions: Blood test findings are useful for detecting gastric neoplasms, except for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The addition of G-17 levels to PG tests is only beneficial for diagnosing gastric neoplasms associated with corpus atrophy, such as adenoma and neuroendocrine tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05883345).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.