ArticleInternational neurourology journal2025
Is Cystoscopic Intravesical Injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA Acceptable in an Outpatient Clinic?
Article in International neurourology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technological Innovation and Patient-Centered Research Lead to Improved Treatment Outcomes.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for refractory overactive bladder. While the procedure can be performed in outpatient clinics under local anesthetic, some clinicians still use sedation or general anesthesia in an operating theatre. Our study aimed to assess acceptability of intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection versus widely accepted diagnostic cystoscopy in the outpatient setting via the medium of patient experience.
methodsA 16-item patient experience survey was administered following diagnostic cystoscopy or intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection in an outpatient clinic. Both procedures were performed using a flexible cystoscope with local anesthetic gel. A visual analogue scale (VAS) assessed intraprocedure pain. Dichotomous questions assessed whether significant pain or postprocedure symptoms were experienced and if these required medical attention. A free-text question assessed which symptoms had occurred.
resultsOne hundred responses from 188 patients were received (53.2% response rate). Sixty-eight patients underwent cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection and 32 diagnostic cystoscopy. Mean VAS scores were higher for onabotulinumtoxinA injection (24 of 100) than diagnostic cystoscopy (11 of 100) (P=0.002). VAS scores were higher among patients reporting preprocedure anxiety (31 of 100 vs. 14 of 100, P=0.0013). Twenty-four percent of onabotulinumtoxinA injection patients experienced symptoms postprocedure versus 41% for cystoscopy. Medical attention was sought more frequently in the diagnostic cystoscopy group (9.4% vs. 1.5%). Common symptoms following both procedures were dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, abdominal pain and urine discoloration.
conclusionCystoscopic intravesical injection of onabotulinumtoxinA appears more painful than diagnostic cystoscopy. However, as VAS scores were relatively low, this is unlikely to represent clinically significant discomfort burdensome to the patient. There were no significant complications postprocedure. Cystoscopic intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection is acceptable in an outpatient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.