ArticleInternational neurourology journal2025
Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation and Intradetrusor Onabotulinum Toxin in the Management of Stroke Associated Urinary Incontinence.
Article in International neurourology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sacral and Bladder Stimulation Synergistically Treat Post-Stroke Urgency Incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Technological Innovation and Patient-Centered Research Lead to Improved Treatment Outcomes.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUrgency urinary incontinence (UUI) is a common finding in patients with a history of stroke or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). UUI is associated with impaired quality of life as well as increased morbidity, mortality, and need for institutionalization. Medical therapy is often limited by side effects and/or cost prohibitiveness. As a result, third-line therapy is often implemented. The objective is to determine the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and onabotulinum toxin (BTX) in the management of post-CVA UUI.
methodsRetrospective analysis was performed to identify patients with post-CVA UUI who underwent SNM or BTX at a large academic medical center. The primary outcome was patient symptom response to third-line therapy. Treatment response was determined using the global response assessment scale. Patients reporting >50% improvement were categorized as having significant response. Secondary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving total dry and duration of therapy for those achieving significant response.
resultsOne hundred seventy-seven patients were identified (95 BTX, 82 SNM). Patients in the BTX group were older (71.9 years vs. 67.4 years, P=0.02) with otherwise similar demographics. Rate of symptom improvement to >50% of baseline was similar between the groups (66% of BTX, 61% of SNM, P=0.46) as was rate of patients experiencing total dryness (24% of BTX, 16% of SNM, P=0.17). Among patients achieving significant improvement there was no difference in continuation of therapy between the BTX and SNM groups. Younger age was identified as a predictor of >50% symptom improvement (odds ratio, 0.96; P=0.04) and treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.97; P=0.04) in SNM. Most common adverse events were urinary tract infection in BTX (11%) and pain in SNM (4%).
conclusionBTX and SNM show roughly equal efficacy in the management of post-CVA UUI with nearly two-thirds of patients achieving significant benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.