ArticleHuman molecular genetics2025
Escape from X-chromosome inactivation at KDM5C is driven by promoter-proximal DNA elements and enhanced by domain context.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Escape from X-chromosome inactivation: from gene discovery to regulatory mechanisms.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Advancing risk gene discovery across the allele frequency spectrum.HGG advances · 2026Review
- Review
- Epigenetic regulation of cardiac physiology and pathophysiology: biological sex matters.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over 20% of human X-linked genes escape from X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), and are important contributors to sex differences in gene expression. Candidate factors involved in escape have been identified through enrichment analyses and include both regional as well as promoter-proximal elements; however, functional testing is limited. Using both in vivo and in vitro mouse models, we refine a region of just 2.6 kb of the human escape gene KDM5C as able to drive escape from XCI. Transgenes of mouse Kdm5c escape XCI; however, human KDM5C is one of three escape genes in a more than 200 kb region, so we initially tested a BAC transgene containing a full-length version of the gene with a reporter insertion. Contrary to our expectation, this transgene failed to escape from XCI. To understand why, we moved to a mouse embryonic stem cell system and tested the BAC transgene without the reporter cassette. Despite being separated from other human escape genes, and also being tested in a different species, human KDM5C was able to escape from XCI, suggesting that the reporter integration disrupted or separated critical escape elements. We refined escape-essential sequences to only 2.6 kb including the promoter, exon 1 and contiguous 1.6 kb of the first intron, consistent with previous studies demonstrating local elements are sufficient for escape. Interestingly, dual copy insertions showed higher escape, suggesting that while local elements are important drivers for escape, the size or number of escape genes in a region can boost inactive X expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.