ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025
Comparison of Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Delay and Underuse of Cochlear Implants.
Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cochlear Implants: An Overview.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate and compare socioeconomic factors associated with underuse and prolonged time to cochlear implant (CI) surgery for qualifying candidates. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study of adult patients who were CI candidates from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022.
settingThree tertiary academic centers.
methodsDemographic factors (age, sex, race, zip code, insurance status, preferred language, and marital status) and speech recognition scores in quiet and distance to CI center were collected. Household income quintiles were determined based on zip code matching to US Census data. Main outcomes were decision to pursue CI surgery and time elapsed from initial candidacy to surgery.
resultsA total of 382 patients were evaluated for CI candidacy and included in the analysis (191 [50%] women; median age, 70 years; interquartile range [IQR] 58-78). Of these, 306 (80%) underwent cochlear implantation. Multivariable analyses revealed that, among those who qualified, patients with non-English-speaking status (odds ratio [OR] 0.31 [95% CI: 0.13-0.71]), older age (OR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99]), male sex (OR 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23-0.72]), and higher speech recognition scores (21%-40%: OR 0.33 [95% CI: 0.15-0.70]; >41%: OR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.076-0.74]) were less likely to receive surgery. Among those who underwent surgery, only non-English-speaking patients experienced significantly longer time to surgery relative to English-speaking patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% CI: 0.43-0.97]).
conclusionLanguage is a potential enduring factor impacting both pursuit of and time to CI surgery. Future work should consider target strategies to account for these factors as a way to improve CI access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.