Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211676›Full record

Trial reportColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

Development and validation of an anastomotic risk score for use in a randomized clinical trial on defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Martin Rutegård, Ida Hed Myrberg, Caroline Nordenvall, Kalle Landerholm, Fredrik Jörgren, Peter Matthiessen, Jennifer Park, Josefin Segelman, Pamela Buchwald, Jenny Häggström

Abstract readValidation StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Development and validation of an anastomotic risk score for use in a randomized clinical trial on defunctioning stoma use in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martin RutegårdDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ida Hed MyrbergDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Caroline NordenvallDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kalle LanderholmDepartment of Surgery, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Fredrik JörgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter MatthiessenDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Jennifer ParkDepartment of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-475X
Josefin SegelmanDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pamela BuchwaldDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6407-5552
Jenny HäggströmDepartment of Statistics, Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

Astma- och AllergiförbundetCancerfondenCancerföreningen i StockholmVetenskapsrådet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe selective use of defunctioning stomas in anterior resection for rectal cancer hinges on accurately predicting anastomotic leakage. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for use in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

methodColorectal Cancer Database (CRCBaSe) Sweden was used to identify patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer 2007-2021. Eligibility criteria mirrored the forthcoming SELective defunctioning Stoma Approach in low anterior resection for rectal cancer (SELSA) trial, including patients <80 years of age and with American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status grade of <III; further, patients without a defunctioning stoma were excluded. The outcome comprised anastomotic leakage within 30 days or in-hospital. Candidate predictors included age, sex, ASA grade, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, body mass index (BMI), tumour stage, tumour height, and neoadjuvant therapy. Seven models were developed and internally validated using bootstrapping. A threshold of a predicted leakage risk of ≤10% was chosen for trial implementation. Validation was conducted using chart-reviewed data from a nested cohort.

resultsOf the 2727 eligible patients, 199 (7.3%) were registered with an anastomotic leakage. All models demonstrated similar performance, with prediction instability observed for risks exceeding 12.5%. The preferred model included three significant predictors: male sex (OR 2.00; 95% CI: 1.45-2.75), BMI >30 kg/m

conclusionAccuracy of anastomotic leakage prediction using registry-based data is moderate; however, the model's ability to rule out a >10% risk is considered appropriate for trial use.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwedenanastomosisdiverting stomainsufficiencyleakagepredictiontotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID40211676
PMCPMC11986403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.