ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as an indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of the product of the reverse Shock Index (rSI) and the simplified Motor Score (sMS) (rSIsMS) as a predictor of clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma.
methodsPatients who presented with abdominal trauma to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital between 2023 and 2024 were included in the study. Using the patients' data, we calculated the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Additionally, the rSIsMS and the product of the rSI and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (rSIG) were calculated.
resultsA total of 270 patients were included in the study. The diagnostic validity of the TRISS, rSIsMS, and rSIG, which had the highest area under the curve (AUC) values for mortality outcomes, was examined; the AUC values were 0.928, 0.908, and 0.886, respectively. The AUC values of the TRISS and rSIsMS concerning intensive care unit (ICU) needs were 0.844 and 0.852, respectively. With regard to surgical intervention needs, the AUC values of the TRISS and rSIsMS were 0.774 and 0.881, respectively. The diagnostic validity of the rSIsMS for surgical intervention needs was significantly higher than that of the TRISS (p<0.001, DeLong test). Concerning massive transfusion protocol (MTP) requirements, the AUC values of the TRISS and rSIsMS were 0.799 and 0.930, respectively. The diagnostic validity of the rSIsMS for MTP requirements was significantly higher than that of the TRISS (p<0.001, DeLong test).
conclusionThe rSIsMS is superior to other trauma scores in predicting MTP and surgical intervention needs in patients with abdominal trauma, and it performs similarly to other trauma scores in predicting mortality and ICU needs. The ease of calculation and its ability to be obtained at the bedside may further enhance the clinical utility of the rSIsMS in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.