ReviewProteomics2025
Peptide Property Prediction for Mass Spectrometry Using AI: An Introduction to State of the Art Models.
Review in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marine Antimicrobial Peptides: From Ocean Biodiversity to Genome Mining, Multi-Omics Discovery, and Biotechnological Innovation in the Battle Against Antimicrobial Resistance.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Integration of alternative fragmentation techniques into standard LC-MS workflows using a single deep learning model enhances proteome coverage.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Carafe2 enables high qualitybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- FastSpel: A Method for Fast Spectral Library Generation.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review explores state of the art machine learning and deep learning models for peptide property prediction in mass spectrometry-based proteomics, including, but not limited to, models for predicting digestibility, retention time, charge state distribution, collisional cross section, fragmentation ion intensities, and detectability. The combination of these models enables not only the in silico generation of spectral libraries but also finds many additional use cases in the design of targeted assays or data-driven rescoring. This review serves as both an introduction for newcomers and an update for experienced researchers aiming to develop accessible and reproducible models for peptide property predictions. Key limitations of the current models, including difficulties in handling diverse post-translational modifications and instrument variability, highlight the need for large-scale, harmonized datasets, and standardized evaluation metrics for benchmarking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.