ArticleQualitative health research2026
Working With Value Complexity in Healthcare.
Article in Qualitative health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we argue for a rethinking of complexity in healthcare in terms of value complexity. Although widely adopted in healthcare, the positivist roots of complexity theory have thus far limited its applicability to understand the wicked nature of many healthcare challenges. We draw on a new pragmatist approach to contend that values are situated and embedded in practice, and demonstrate how values and practices co-develop in ways resembling complex systems. We employ this analytical lens in a secondary analysis of prior ethnographic and action research undertaken between 2010 and 2022 in the context of Dutch healthcare. These studies were conducted in the context of older person care and the (care) services for people with chronic diseases, disabilities, and mental illness. Based on our findings, we bring forward a layered conceptualization of value complexity. Additionally, we illustrate three ways in which practitioners and scholars manage value complexity: "working around," "working against," and "working with" complexity. We consider the (dis)advantages of each of these strategies. We conclude that "working with" complexity is difficult in practice yet provides untapped potential to responsibly manage value conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.