ReviewHGG advances2025
The chromosomal challenge of human embryos: Mechanisms and fundamentals.
Review in HGG advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal MLH3 dysfunction drives unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss via impaired oocyte maturation and defective decidualization.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Intermediate Filament Protein BFSP2 Controls Spindle Formation via HSC70-Mediated Stabilization of CLTC During Oocyte meiosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The chromosomal challenge of human embryos: Mechanisms and fundamentals.HGG advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromosomal abnormalities in human pre-implantation embryos, originating from either meiotic or mitotic errors, present a significant challenge in reproductive biology. Complete aneuploidy is primarily linked to errors during the resumption of meiosis in oocyte maturation, which increase with maternal age, while mosaic aneuploidies result from mitotic errors after fertilization. The biological causes of these abnormalities are increasingly becoming a topic of interest for research groups and clinical specialists. This review explores the intricate processes of meiotic and early mitotic divisions in embryos, shedding light on the mechanisms that lead to changes in chromosome number in daughter cells. Key factors in meiotic division include difficulties in spindle assembly without centrosomes, kinetochore (KT) orientation disturbances, and inefficient cell-cycle checkpoints. The weakening of cohesion molecules that bind chromosomes, exacerbated by maternal aging, further complicates chromosomal segregation. Mitotic errors in early development are influenced by defects in sperm centrosomes, KT misalignment, and the gradual depletion of maternal regulatory factors. Coupled with the inactive or partially active embryonic genome, this depletion increases the likelihood of chromosomal aberrations. While various theoretical mechanisms for these abnormalities exist, current data remain insufficient to determine their exact contributions. Continued research is essential to unravel these complex processes and improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.