Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Finerenone, glycaemic status, and heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: A prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial.
Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of type 2 diabetes, 2026. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Type 1 diabetes and cardiovascular medicine.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2026Review
- Real-world study of finerenone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in Spain.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Albuminuria Is the Key Driver of Kidney Benefit with Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists in Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Overlap Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure: Insights From a Real-World Multinational Cohort.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Finerenone after FINEARTS-HF: evidence boundaries and implementation in heart failure with LVEF ≥40.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Finerenone: Extending MRAs Prognostic Benefit to the Recently Hospitalized and More Symptomatic Patient with HFpEF.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, have not been examined in patients without diabetes. We examined the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to glycaemic status in FINEARTS-HF. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 6001 patients with heart failure (HF) with New York Heart Association functional class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels were randomized to finerenone or placebo. The effect of finerenone according to glycaemic status (i.e. normoglycaemia [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <5.7%], pre-diabetes [no investigator-reported history of diabetes and HbA1c 5.7-6.4%] and diabetes [investigator-reported history of diabetes or HbA1c ≥6.5%]) at baseline were examined. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. At baseline, 1243 (20.8%) patients were normoglycaemic, 1979 (33.1%) had pre-diabetes, and 2764 (46.2%) had diabetes. Compared with patients with normoglycaemia, those with diabetes, but not pre-diabetes, had a higher rate of the primary endpoint (normoglycaemia: reference; pre-diabetes: adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.23; diabetes: adjusted RR 1.32 [95% CI 1.11-1.58]). The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across glycaemic status (normoglycaemia: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.63-1.14]; pre-diabetes: RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.66-1.08]; diabetes: RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.69-0.98]; p
conclusionIn patients with HF with mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction, the beneficial effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on clinical events and symptoms, were consistent, irrespective of glycaemic status at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.