ArticleNursing open2025
A Feasibility Study Assessing a Novel Ambulatory Monitoring System in General Ward Areas: Pilot Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo assess the clinical staff and patient acceptance of a novel ambulatory monitoring system in general medical and surgical inpatient wards.
designThis was a cross-sectional feasibility study undertaken in a single hospital site.
methodsPatients and the nursing staff were asked to provide feedback on a monitoring system via structured questionnaires while enrolled in an observational monitoring system study. Patient recruitment occurred in the general ward areas (both surgical and medical). Patients were asked to wear the ambulatory monitoring system, and physiological data were sampled, whereas staff were asked to train on the monitoring system and utilise it in clinical care.
resultsQuestionnaire feedback collected from 27 staff surveyed showed that 96% of responses reported the system was good or very good to use. Thirty-four participants wore the monitoring system for an average duration of 21 h, and 91% reported it was comfortable to wear. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients participated in the design of this feasibility study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.