ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Lateral epicondyle osteotomy results in improved radiologic and functional outcomes in severe lateral tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe medial tibial plateau fractures: feasibility and functional and radiographic results of an extended approach with medial femoral epicondyle osteotomy.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Gerdy's tubercle osteotomy versus conventional anterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of lateral tibial plateau fractures involving the central and postero-lateral regions, comparing an extended lateral approach with lateral epicondyle osteotomy (ECO) to a conventional approach without an extention (No-ECO).
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at two centers, examining complex lateral tibial plateau fractures treated with either an extended lateral approach with ECO or without it. Only AO/OTA type B3/C3 fractures involving the antero-latero-central (ALC) and postero-latero-central (PLC) segments were included. Fracture reduction quality was assessed via post-operative CT scans, and clinical outcomes and complications were evaluated over a minimum of 24-month follow-up.
resultsA total of 110 patients (mean age: 51.3 ± 11.1 years) were included, with an average follow-up of 52.7 ± 16.9 months. The ECO group (n = 56) consisted of more severe injuries, indicated by higher external fixator use (48.2% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.0044) and additional affected segments. Postoperative CT scans revealed that the ECO group had significantly less fracture step-off (0.8 mm vs. 3.0 mm, p = 0.0002) and angulation at the ALC/PLC (8.1° vs. 20.1°, p = 0.0002) segment and PLC/PLL (postero-latero-lateral) (2.2° vs. 7.5°, p = 0.02) segments. Clinically, the ECO group achieved superior IKDC scores (71.7 vs. 63.7, p = 0.0097). A negative correlation was found between postoperative ALC/PLC depression and IKDC scores (r=-0.36, p = 0.0002).
conclusionPatients treated with ECO had a significantly better clinical and radiologic postoperative outcomes, with the quality of fracture reduction positively correlating with the clinical IKDC score. This was achieved despite more severe injuries, as indicated by higher external fixator use and number of affected segments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Study.
trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered and conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local Ethics Committee (PV7319).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.