ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Enhancing chemical reaction search through contrastive representation learning and human-in-the-loop.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In synthesis planning, identifying and optimizing chemical reactions are important for the successful design of synthetic pathways to target substances. Chemical reaction databases assist chemists in gaining insights into this process. Traditionally, searching for relevant records from a reaction database has relied on the manual formulation of queries by chemists based on their search purposes, which is challenging without explicit knowledge of what they are searching for. In this study, we propose an intelligent chemical reaction search system that simplifies the process of enhancing the search results. When a user submits a query, a list of relevant records is retrieved from the reaction database. Users can express their preferences and requirements by providing binary ratings for the individual retrieved records. The search results are refined based on the user feedback. To implement this system effectively, we incorporate and adapt contrastive representation learning, dimensionality reduction, and human-in-the-loop techniques. Contrastive learning is used to train a representation model that embeds records in the reaction database as numerical vectors suitable for chemical reaction searches. Dimensionality reduction is applied to compress these vectors, thereby enhancing the search efficiency. Human-in-the-loop is integrated to iteratively update the representation model by reflecting user feedback. Through experimental investigations, we demonstrate that the proposed method effectively improves the chemical reaction search towards better alignment with user preferences and requirements. Scientific contribution This study seeks to enhance the search functionality of chemical reaction databases by drawing inspiration from recommender systems. The proposed method simplifies the search process, offering an alternative to the complexity of formulating explicit query rules. We believe that the proposed method can assist users in efficiently discovering records relevant to target reactions, especially when they encounter difficulties in crafting detailed queries due to limited knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.