Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211326›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Examining the relationship between nursing staff demographics, work characteristics, and toxic leadership in Saudi Arabia: a cross-section approach.

Nada Alqarawi, Ibrahim Alasqah, Awadh Shaman Al Harbi, Cris S Adolfo, Joseph U Almazan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nada AlqarawiDepartment of Psychiatric and Mental Health, and Community Health, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlasqahDepartment of Psychiatric and Mental Health, and Community Health, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi Arabia. i.alasqah@qu.edu.sa.
Awadh Shaman Al HarbiDirector of Nursing Services, Qassim Health Cluster, King Saud Hospital in Onaizah, Buraydah, 52367, Saudi Arabia.
Cris S AdolfoDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia.
Joseph U AlmazanMedicine Department, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxic leadership contributes significantly to nursing turnover and workplace dissatisfaction in healthcare settings. Understanding what drives nurses' toxic leadership is critical in formulating interventions that improve workplace conditions and foster a healthier work environment. This study examined the relationship between demographics, work characteristics, and perceived toxic leadership among nurses in working in healthcare settings in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted with 691 nurses working in various healthcare settings across Saudi Arabia using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using demographic characteristics and the Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis were used to examine the relationships between demographic factors and toxic leadership ratings.

resultsThe mean Toxic Leadership Scale score was 103.21, with narcissism scoring highest (71.68), followed by unpredictability (59.42) and self-promotion (59.39). Younger nurses reported higher levels of toxic leadership (p < 0.001), females reported more abusive supervision (p < 0.05), and single nurses reported higher self-promotion (p < 0.05). Nurses with postgraduate education had higher TLS scores (p < 0.001), and those with less than 10 years of experience in emergency and medical departments also reported higher scores (p < 0.001). Indian nurses had the highest TLS scores (p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences based on weekly working hours (p > 0.05). Multiple regression analysis (R² = 0.099, p < 0.001) found that non-reference hospital work (B = 2.894, p < 0.001), younger age (B = -5.227, p = 0.045), postgraduate education (B = 6.015, p = 0.005), and non-Saudi nationality (B = 5.009, p = 0.004) were significant predictors of higher TLS scores.

conclusionThis study highlights the necessity of implementing specific strategies aimed at mitigating toxic leadership behaviors in hospital settings. Perceived toxic leadership was higher among non-Saudi, younger, educated nurses, staff employed, and those working in specific hospital types. Implementing leadership training, organizational reforms, and supportive workplace policies can help reduce the toxic leadership and ultimately improve retention and job satisfaction among nurses.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studyHealth care personnelLeadership effectivenessNursingSaudi ArabiaToxic leadershipWorkplace environment

Identifiers

PMID40211326
PMCPMC11987378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.