Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211291›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care (iSedPall): a multi-modal intervention pilot study protocol.

Christoph Ostgathe, Claudia Bausewein, Eva Schildmann, Jeremias Bazata, Maria Heckel, Saskia Kauzner, Carsten Klein, Sabine H Krauss, Alexander Kremling, Manuela Schneider and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christoph Ostgathe *Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Claudia Bausewein *Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eva Schildmann *Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jeremias BazataDepartment of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria HeckelDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Saskia KauznerDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. saskia.kauzner@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-5380
Carsten KleinDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine H KraussDepartment of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander KremlingInstitute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Manuela SchneiderDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen - EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas SeifertPaderborn Centre for Educational Research and Teacher Education - PLAZ Professional School, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.
Kerstin ZieglerDepartment of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Criminal Law and Medical Criminal Law, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Christian Jäger *Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Criminal Law and Medical Criminal Law, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Jan Schildmann *Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GY2020A-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care is common but presents challenges due to specific medical, ethical, and legal considerations. There is little to no assistance for administering adequate sedative drug doses, ensuring accurate documentation before and during sedation, or managing ethically and legally challenging situations. In 2021, the SedPall study group published recommendations on the use of sedative drugs in palliative care. The German Association for Palliative Medicine endorsed the dissemination of the recommendations nationwide. However, disseminating recommendations alone does not necessarily lead to changes in clinical practice. In the project "Development and piloting of a multi-modal intervention for the use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care (iSedPall)", we will develop a multi-modal intervention that implements these national recommendations into practical tools for healthcare professionals in specialist inpatient and home care settings. In the pilot study described below, we aim to test the feasibility of the multi-modal intervention, its appropriateness, and acceptability as primary feasibility outcomes of the multi-modal intervention. Additionally, we aim to assess the feasibility of measuring healthcare professionals´ confidence in using sedative drugs as an outcome indicator for a possible subsequent study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a mixed-methods approach to develop and pilot a multi-modal intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes and formative evaluation of the implementation process will be explored using quantitative (retrospective cohort study, survey) and qualitative elements (focus groups, interviews). Additionally, we will pilot the measurement of healthcare professionals´ confidence in using sedative drugs as an outcome indicator through a pre-post survey. Four specialist palliative care services will pilot the complex intervention for nine months. Due to the complexity of the intervention, we will follow the principles of the MRC framework for complex interventions and will apply a Theory of Change approach. The intervention will include different elements to be used throughout the patients' treatment in inpatient and home specialist palliative care considering medical, ethical, and legal aspects for the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation. The evaluation of the overall feasibility and the decision about proceeding to an implementation study will be based on the integration of quantitative and qualitative data, according to our mixed-methods approach. DISCUSSION: This project is the first attempt to translate national recommendations on best practices for sedative drug use into a multi-modal intervention and tests its feasibility. The study group identified potential risks and challenges related to the intervention´s feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness in advance. To mitigate these risks, the study protocol is based on a theoretical framework, developed through a Theory of Change approach. Participatory elements and the involvement of different stakeholders are expected to enhance user acceptance and feasibility, potentially improving the development of supporting materials for sedative drug use in specialist palliative care while considering the interests of non-professionals.

trial registrationRegistered in the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00027241; Registered: 10/12/2021; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do .

Indexed as

Multi-modal interventionPalliative careSedative drugsStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID40211291
PMCPMC11984285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.