ArticleRespiratory research2025
In-situ simulation-based team training reduces incidence of negative events during bronchoscopy. A prospective educational intervention cohort study.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile bronchoscopy complications are rare, they can be life-threatening if not quickly managed. This study evaluates the effect of a case-based bronchoscopy simulation training using real-world data on complication incidence and nature.
methodsBased on semi structured interviews with respiratory staff in a bronchoscopy unit a team simulation training case was constructed. It was assessed using the Kirkpatrick framework to measure changes in procedural behavior by the rate of adverse events (level three) as the main outcome. Participants' reactions, changes in stress levels, and patient perspectives (levels one, two, and four) were evaluated via questionnaires.
resultsFollowing the educational intervention, the incidence of any negative events during bronchoscopies was reduced from 62% (38/61) to 41% (26/63), p = 0.019. The most frequent event was oxygen desaturation below 90%, which occurred in 34% of the bronchoscopies before the intervention vs. 11% afterwards, p = 0.002. The participants found the simulation-based training relevant but did not change the perceived level of stress. The patient reported to be less awake (2, IQR 1-5, vs. 5, IQR 3-8), p = 0.02 after the intervention.
conclusionIncorporation of in-situ simulation-based team-training for crisis management during bronchoscopy alter procedural behavior and significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse events; therefore, it should be integrated into future bronchoscopy training curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.