Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211266›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Enhancing nursing practice through patient outcome measures: a framework for optimizing care in intracranial surgery.

Rasha Hassan Abbas Shady, Rasha Hafez Ramadan El-Shaboury, Reham AbdElhamed AbdElmawla Elsaid, Shereen Abd El-Moniem Ahmed, Ghada Gamal Badawy, Warda Elshahat Hamed, Rania Rabie El-Etreby, Ayman Muhammad Kamel Senosy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rasha Hassan Abbas ShadyMedical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Rasha Hafez Ramadan El-ShabouryMedical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Reham AbdElhamed AbdElmawla ElsaidMedical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Shereen Abd El-Moniem AhmedMedical-Surgical Nursing, Suez Canal University, Suez, Egypt.
Ghada Gamal BadawyPediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Warda Elshahat HamedPsychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Rania Rabie El-EtrebyPsychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Ayman Muhammad Kamel SenosyMedical-Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. dr.aymansenosy@nursing.asu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-8330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nursing practices are evidence-based and have not been systematically applied to patients undergoing intracranial surgeries, which is one of the most critical procedures for treating brain diseases. Nursing care prevents complications, minimizes infections, and ensures a healthy, speedy recovery across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the enhancement of nursing practice through patient outcome measures for optimizing care in intracranial surgeries.

methodA quasi-experimental design was utilized in this study. The study was conducted at the neurosurgery unit at the Mansoura University Hospital with 50 nurses and 100 patients, 50 for each control and intervention group. The patients were divided into study groups in which the trained nurses applied to nursing practices, and the control group received only their usual care. TOOLS: Four tools were used, including a structured interview questionnaire sheet. Nurses' knowledge and nursing practices for patients undergoing intracranial surgeries, patients' outcomes, and observational performance checklist. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, which is a statistical test used to analyze the difference between the means of more than two groups. The chi-square, SD (standard deviation), MH (marginal homogeneity test), and t (paired t-test) have been involved in the study.

resultsNurses' knowledge improved from 42.9% fair pre-application to 54% good post-application (P < 0.001). Pre- and postoperative practices also showed marked progress, with satisfactory practice levels rising from 66% to 72% in second observations, respectively (P < 0.001). Patient outcomes improved, with 62% of the study group showing moderate positive outcomes compared to 92% negative in the control group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores rose significantly, from a mean of 25.3 pre-application to 83.9 post-application (P < 0.001).

conclusionThe study demonstrated significant improvements in nurses' knowledge, practices, and patient outcomes following the implementation of the nursing practices. RECOMMENDATIONS: Implement the nursing practices as a standard protocol to enhance nursing practices, improve patient recovery, and reduce complications in neurosurgical care.

Indexed as

Intracranial surgeriesNursing practiceOutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID40211266
PMCPMC11987256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.