ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Instrument retrieval using ultrasonics and minimally invasive guided endodontics using AReneto
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing endodontics: the impact and innovations of artificial intelligence.BMC oral health · 2026Review
- Evaluation of fracture resistance in a single rooted mandibular first premolar following access opening with ARenetoJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Augmented reality-guided endodontics: Minimally invasive access through the prosthesis using AReneto® system - A case series.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInstrument separation during root canal treatment presents a significant challenge, particularly in the apical third of the canal. This case report highlights the use of ultrasonics for retrieving a separated instrument and demonstrates the application of augmented reality using the AReneto CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old Indian male presented with pain in the lower left front teeth, following root canal treatment on tooth 33. Clinical examination revealed tenderness on percussion, and radiographs showed a separated instrument in the apical third of tooth 33, along with periapical radiolucency involving teeth 33 and 32. Ultrasonics under magnification were used to successfully retrieve the separated instrument from tooth 33, followed by sectional obturation and anatomic post placement. Subsequently, guided access for root canal treatment was performed on tooth 32 using the AReneto
conclusionThe use of ultrasonics combined with magnification enabled effective instrument retrieval, while the AReneto
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.