ArticleBMC medical education2025
Comprehensive evaluation of the educational impact and effectiveness of specialized study modules in cross-sectional anatomy: a study on student engagement and learning outcomes.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of 3D-Printed Models and Augmented Reality in Medical Student Education of Congenital Heart Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Students' Learning Outcomes in a Virtual Microscopic Online and Face-to-Face Anatomy Course: Cross-Over Comparative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Andragogic Model Curriculum for One-Year ACGME-Accredited Fellowship Programs: Single-Center Educational Improvement Project.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Awareness and self-reported synesthesia related experiences among undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study.BMC neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficacy of an Imaging Anatomy Virtual Simulation Experiment Course in Undergraduate Medical Education: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Digital Choice Architecture in Medical Education: Applying Behavioral Economics to Online Learning Environments.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating Study Techniques for Australian Medical Students During Clinical Placement: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Impact of Community-Oriented Medical Education on Medical Students' Perceptions of Community Health Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: a survey of resident physicians' needs for cross-sectional anatomy education and a collaborative teaching framework.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Awareness and Perception of concept of body donation among the first year medical students: A questionnaire-based study.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Text Neck Syndrome Among Medical Students in Chennai, India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Anatomage Table Vet for Teaching the Triadan Dental Classification System: A Brief Trial and Feedback from the Students.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Medical Students' Perception Toward Various Human Anatomy Teaching Methods in Khartoum, Sudan.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Assessing the efficacy of the Pomodoro technique in enhancing anatomy lesson retention during study sessions: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine: Challenges Across Diagnostic Imaging, Clinical Decision Support, Surgery, Pathology, and Drug Discovery.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Special Study Modules (SSMs) in Cross-Sectional Anatomy. These modules offer students the opportunity to develop their learning skills and foster specific academic interests. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction levels and learning outcomes of students who participated in the Cross-Sectional Anatomy SSMs, as determined by their feedback.
methodsData for this descriptive study were collected from student feedback at the beginning and end of the SSMs. A total of 100 undergraduate medical students provided feedback on the modules between 2018 and 2022. The student survey consisted of 11 questions, and feedback was obtained using an open-ended questionnaire.
results74% of students emphasized the importance of these classes (p = 0.004).Teamwork was also significantly valued by 9% of students (p = 0.025). While 52% of students appreciated the module for presentation skills and clinical learning, the difference was not statistically significant. The module's impact on career choice and communication with faculty was noted by 13% of the students (p = 0.057).
conclusionsCross-sectional anatomy SSMs were found to be valuable by students, enhancing their ability to identify anatomical structures in cross-sectional images and distinguish sections from different levels and regions. SSMs also promote greater proficiency in imaging techniques. Overall, these modules were effective in key educational domains, particularly in facilitating the integration of knowledge and fostering teamwork among participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.