ArticleBMC oral health2025
Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of biodegradable mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage in the mandible of beagle dogs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a mini-implant composed of unsintered hydroxyapatite, poly (L-lactic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (u-HA/PLLA/PLGA) composites as an anchorage device under consistent orthodontic force (OF) loading in vivo.
methodsAn mandible model in beagle dogs was introduced. 144 mini-implants were implanted in both sides of the mandibles. The mini-implants in the experimental group (left side) were loaded at the magnitude of 200 g to simulate the OF. At 2, 4 and 6 months after implantation, tissue specimens were taken from the implanted sites and biomechanical, histological and histomorphometrical analysis were performed.
resultsMini-implants in the group with the highest PLLA ratio showed a 27% non-fracture rate after 4 months and 20.83% after 6 months in beagle dogs, and the non-fractured mini-implants could maintain the tensile force of 200 g, while mini-implants in the other two groups were all fractured. Histomorphological analysis showed that there was no significant relationship between Bone Volume over Total Volume (BV/TV) and the implantation time among the most of the groups. The level of Bone-Implant Contact ratio (BIC) in Medium and Low ratio group were decreased gradually from 2 to 6 months.
conclusionsThis study showed the biodegradable mini-implant could work as an alternative to the titanium alloy mini-implant by adjusting the proportion of its ingredients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Degradable mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage lie in their potential to revolutionize orthodontic treatments by offering a biodegradable alternative that minimizes the need for secondary surgeries for removal, thereby enhancing patient comfort and reducing overall treatment time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.