Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211247›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Invisible but palpable- gender norms in childbirth : A focused ethnography on woman-midwife interaction and birth practices in two Swedish hospital labour wards.

Agneta Westergren, Kerstin Edin, Bo Nilsson, Monica Christianson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agneta WestergrenSexual and Reproductive Health, Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden. agneta.westergren@umu.se.
Kerstin EdinDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bo NilssonDepartment of Culture and Media Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Monica ChristiansonSexual and Reproductive Health, Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSwedish labour care is becoming increasingly medicalised, with rising rates of intrapartum interventions such as induction and augmentation of labour, epidural analgesia, and caesarean section. This study aimed to explore the paradox of the increasing medicalisation of childbirth despite the vast evidence of the benefits of low-intervention physiological birth.

methodsFocused ethnography was used to study woman-midwife interactions during labour and birth and the everyday practices of midwives in two Swedish labour wards. After birth, the women and midwives were interviewed. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, and the study design and interpretation of results were informed by a social constructionist view of gender.

resultsThe analysis resulted in three themes, mirroring the pillars on which labour and birth care rests- the labour care organisation, the midwives, and the women who give birth. The organisation was hierarchical and based on traditional masculine values such as rationality, efficiency, and productivity. The midwives tried to balance the needs of the birthing women and the organisational demands of throughput. As action and technological skills are more noticeable and linked to masculinity, and thus more valued than the invisible feminine-coded emotional care work of supporting a woman in labour, the midwives became task-oriented and more focused on 'doing' than on 'being'. This led to more birth interventions, less support for the birthing women, and to occupational stress and stress of conscience for the midwives. Normative expressions of femininity were observed in the birthing women, such as placing the needs of others before their own and acts of compliance, which sometimes led to unconsented interventions.

conclusionsWe suggest that societal gender norms and gender-based hierarchies in combination with modern society becoming progressively risk-laden and technology-oriented, have contributed to an increasingly medicalised and interventionist labour and birth care organisation, where physiological birth is rare. Awareness of how gender norms inform labour and birth care practice may be one way to make visible and to recognise all aspects of midwifery care, as well as help flatten hospital hierarchies, improve working conditions for midwives, promote physiological birth, and limit unnecessary and unconsented interventions for the birthing women.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor, ObstetricMidwiferyNurse-Patient RelationsParturitionAdultAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHumansMaleMasculinityPregnancyQualitative ResearchSwedenBirth settingChildbirthFocused ethnographyGender rolesHierarchyIntrapartum interventionsMedicalisationMidwiferyPhysiological birthPower relations

Identifiers

PMID40211247
PMCPMC11987295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.