Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211192›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Construction of an evaluation index system for hospital resilience to emerging infectious diseases: a Delphi study from China.

Kangyao Cheng, Ziwei Xu, Yanyan Zhang, Rujie Chen, Li Gui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kangyao Cheng *School of Nursing, Naval Medical University, No.800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Ziwei Xu *School of Nursing, Naval Medical University, No.800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yanyan Zhang *School of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1200 Cailun Road, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Rujie ChenSchool of Nursing, Naval Medical University, No.800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Li GuiSchool of Nursing, Naval Medical University, No.800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. guili@smmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72174205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe frequent outbreak of infectious diseases has presented unparalleled challenges to hospitals globally. The pressure exerted on healthcare systems during these crises accentuates the imperative need for enhanced management and resource allocation, further emphasizing the pivotal role of hospital resilience. As the vanguard in combating infectious disease outbreaks, bolstering hospital resilience has become a strategic imperative to fortify healthcare systems against the unpredictable and volatile landscape of global health threats. Consequently, in this study, we aimed to develop an index system for the comprehensive evaluation of hospital resilience in response to emerging infectious diseases.

methodsDrawing on the World Health Organization "Action Framework" for responding to infectious disease outbreaks, the Delphi method was implemented to identify the core evaluation index of hospital resilience in the context of emerging infectious diseases. In this method, we assembled a panel of 16 health experts specializing in medical statistics, infectious disease prevention and control, emergency medicine, hospital management, and public health administration. The panel evaluated the importance of the proposed indicators using a five-point Likert scale, supplemented by their qualitative feedback. To ascertain the weights of these indicators, the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Precedence Chart were integrated.

resultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation on the evaluation index system, a consensus was reached. The system contained five first-level indicators (hospital command and coordination capacity, hospital monitoring capacity, hospital risk communication capacity, hospital medical response capacity, and hospital health management capacity) affiliated with 13 second-level indicators and 32 third-level indicators. Among the primary indicators, hospital command and coordination capacity had the highest weight, followed by hospital medical response capacity. The expert authority coefficient of consultation was 0.96. The Kendall's concordance coefficients of the total indicators were 0.223 and 0.342, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe evaluation index system for hospital resilience to emerging infectious diseases, developed using the Delphi method in this study, is comprehensive and possesses high scientific reliability. The widespread application of this index system can assist hospitals in identifying and ameliorating weaknesses in their resilience capabilities, thereby enhancing their rapid response and adaptability to potential future outbreaks.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingDisease OutbreaksHospitalsChinaDelphi TechniqueHumansDelphi methodEmerging infectious diseasesEvaluation researchHospitalResilience

Identifiers

PMID40211192
PMCPMC11983733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.