Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211181›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Endometrial echo patterns of embryo transfer day affect pregnancy outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective clinical study.

Xi Cheng, Bin Yang, Li Wang, Jinzhao Ma, Xuan Huang, Kadiliya Jueraitetibaike, Cheng Zhou, Xu Tang, Haiyan Fu, Biying Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xi Cheng *Department of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Bin Yang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Li Wang *Center of Reproductive Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250001, China.
Jinzhao MaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Xuan HuangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Kadiliya JueraitetibaikeDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Cheng ZhouDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Xu TangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Haiyan FuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Biying LiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Xiting CaiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China.
Bing YaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. yaobing@nju.edu.cn.
Li ChenDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. chenli1978@nju.edu.cn.

Funding

Annual Foundation of Nanjing Jinling Hospital 22LCYY-QH12Annual Foundation of Nanjing Jinling Hospital YYQN2021082National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe echo pattern constitutes an ultrasonic index that reflects the characteristics of the endometrium across various phases of the menstrual cycle. However, consensus of endometrial echo pattern and pregnancy outcomes is lacking in clinical application.

methodsThe retrospective cohort study analyzed the data from the electronic records of women who underwent frozen embryo transfer (FET) with hormone replacement treatment (not only one cycle per patient) between July 2020 to August 2021 at Reproduction Medicine Center of Jbnminling Hospital of Medical College of Nanjing University. A total of 138 cleavage stage embryo transfer cycles and 561 blastocyst transfer cycles were analyzed in this study. Transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed on the embryo transfer day. The endometrial echo pattern was classified into four types: A, B, B-C and C. Pattern A was defined as trilinear type, Pattern B, B-C and C were defined as non-trilinear type. All scans were conducted by experienced clinicians, and the images were reviewed by the same two physicians. The outcomes measured included embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, first trimester abortion rate, and live birth rate. For the data that conforms to a normal distribution, two independent sample t-tests are used for comparison between two groups, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used for comparison among multiple groups. For the data that does not conform to a normal distribution, rank sum tests (Kruskal-Wallis test) are used for inter-group comparisons. Count data are analyzed using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models were applied for the analysis of clinical outcome.

resultsThe embryo implantation rate (p = 0.066), clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.140), early abortion rate (p = 0.515) and live birth rate (p = 0.578) were similar between the 4 type of endometrial pattern groups in cleavage-stage embryo FET cycles. In blastocyst cycles, the implantation rate (p = 0.201) and clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.555) did not differ between the four endometrial patterns. Patients with a Pattern A endometrium on blastocyst transfer day experienced a decreased live birth rate (19.05%) compared with Pattern B, Pattern B-C and Pattern C (p = 0.006. p = 0.008, p = 0.031 for Pattern A vs. Pattern B, Pattern A vs. Pattern B-C, Pattern A vs. Pattern C). The first trimester abortion rate of Pattern A is up to 40.00%, although there was no statistical difference (p = 0.118). In the cycles of non-trilinear type group, the early miscarriage rate (0.248 [95% CI, 0.067-0.914]; p = 0.036) was lower and the live birth rate (0.269 [95% CI, 0.089-0.810]; p = 0.020) was higher than trilinear type group.

conclusionsOur retrospective study suggests that a trilinear pattern endometrium on blastocyst transfer was associated with a higher first trimester abortion rate and lower live birth rate.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferEndometriumAbortion, SpontaneousAdultCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyEndometrial echo patternsFETFirst trimester abortion rateLive birth rate

Identifiers

PMID40211181
PMCPMC11987345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.