Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211165›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Uncovering the impact of loneliness in ageing populations: a comprehensive scoping review.

Meritxell Puyané, Carolina Chabrera, Enric Camón, Esther Cabrera

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Friend Caregivers Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meritxell PuyanéResearch Group on Chronic Care and Health Innovation (GRACIS) - SGR 01604, Tecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Av. d'Ernest Lluch, 32, Mataró, Barcelona, 08302, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-7249
Carolina ChabreraResearch Group on Chronic Care and Health Innovation (GRACIS) - SGR 01604, Tecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Av. d'Ernest Lluch, 32, Mataró, Barcelona, 08302, Spain. cchabrera@tecnocampus.cat.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-7916
Enric CamónResearch Group on Chronic Care and Health Innovation (GRACIS) - SGR 01604, Tecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Av. d'Ernest Lluch, 32, Mataró, Barcelona, 08302, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-9084
Esther CabreraResearch Group on Chronic Care and Health Innovation (GRACIS) - SGR 01604, Tecnocampus, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Av. d'Ernest Lluch, 32, Mataró, Barcelona, 08302, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7353-0542

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación from the Spanish Government and the Consolidated Research Group on Chronic Care and Health Innovation (GRACIS) PID2022-143121OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEurope's aging population increasingly faces social isolation and loneliness, with nearly 20% of older adults living alone. Social isolation refers to an objective lack of social contact, while loneliness is the subjective experience of unmet social needs. Both are prevalent among community-dwelling older adults, driven by life transitions, loss, and declining health. These issues severely impact mental and physical health, increasing risks of depression and suicidal ideation. This scoping review maps the literature, identifies knowledge gaps, and highlights key challenges regarding loneliness and social isolation in this population.

methodsA scoping review was conducted between March and September 2024, following the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. The review adhered to Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework, which includes identifying research questions, searching for and selecting relevant studies, extracting data, and synthesizing results. The search was conducted in major scientific databases, including Embase, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, along with grey literature sources, including doctoral theses and organizational reports.

resultsA total of 45 studies were included, with 66.6% using quantitative methods, 11.1% using qualitative methods, and the remainder being systematic reviews or mixed-method analyses. The studies revealed a significant prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among community-dwelling older adults, with risk factors including health deterioration, widowhood, and loss of social networks. The consequences of loneliness and isolation span physical and mental health issues, including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, anxiety, depression, and cognitive decline.

conclusionsLoneliness and social isolation among community-dwelling older adults are complex issues with profound implications for physical, mental, and social well-being. Addressing these challenges requires integrative approaches that consider individual, relational, and contextual factors. Further longitudinal and standardized research is needed to improve our understanding of the long-term impacts and effectiveness of interventions to mitigate these issues.

Indexed as

AgingLonelinessSocial IsolationAgedAged, 80 and overHumansIndependent LivingLonelinessOlder adultsScoping reviewSocial isolationWell-being

Identifiers

PMID40211165
PMCPMC11984289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.