ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
OpenClustered: an R package with a benchmark suite of clustered datasets for methodological evaluation and comparison.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClustered data arise when observations are correlated within a group or sampling unit and frequently arise in epidemiology, social sciences, education, linguistics, econometrics, and medicine. Given growing interest in clustered data, we developed a data repository offering clustered datasets that can be used for methodologic comparison with open-source, publicly available data. Traditionally, data simulation studies are employed for methodology evaluation and comparison, which can be fraught with issues such as overly simplistic design and potential for bias. Excellent data repositories are available for standard (non-clustered) datasets, such as OpenML and the Penn Machine Learning Benchmark repository, but there is a paucity of resources available that have clustered data.
resultsIn this pilot study, we developed an R package called OpenClustered, which includes 19 clustered datasets with binary outcomes arising from various domains and varying in terms of their size and composition. We present tutorials for using OpenClustered, including examples for filtering and summarizing the datasets. We demonstrate the use of OpenClustered with a small benchmarking study comparing Frequentist and Bayesian implementations of generalized linear mixed models. All code and data are contained on the OpenClustered GitHub page.
conclusionThe OpenClustered R package is the start of a useful data resource for conducting benchmarking studies with open-source clustered data. It facilitates empirical methodologic guidance that is less prone to bias compared to data simulation studies, thereby improving rigor across diverse research fields. In the future, we plan to add more datasets, particularly those with continuous outcomes, as well as functionality for users to submit their clustered datasets to be included in the repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.