Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211131›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025

Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting post-cesarean pain and individualized pain management strategies: a multicenter study.

Shenjuan Lv, Ning Sun, Chunhui Hao, Junqing Li, Yun Li

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A multicenter study on the prediction model for chronic low back pain after lumbar decompression surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus: integration of metabolic and paraspinal muscle features.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shenjuan Lv *Department of Anesthesiology, Jinan Second Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shandong, China.
Ning Sun *Ultrasound Department, Jinan Second Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shandong, China.
Chunhui HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jinan Second Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shandong, China. hch202408@126.com.
Junqing LiUltrasound Department, Jinan Second Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shandong, China.
Yun LiDepartment of Pain Management, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong, China.

Funding

Shandong Natural Science Foundation ZR2021QH031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective management of postoperative pain remains a significant challenge in obstetric care due to the variability in pain perception and response influenced by physical, medical, and psychosocial factors. Current standardized pain management protocols often fail to accommodate this variability, necessitating more tailored approaches.

objectiveThis study aims to improve postoperative pain management following cesarean sections by developing personalized protocols using machine learning (ML) models.

methodThe study analyzed the efficacy of eight ML models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, and Neural Networks, using data from two distinct hospital cohorts. Performance metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R²) were evaluated through internal and external validations. SHAP value analysis was used to identify key predictors influencing pain management outcomes.

resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest RMSE and highest R². Key factors impacting pain management included esketamine use, anesthesia method, and anesthetic drug type, with esketamine significantly delaying the first activation of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).

conclusionsThe study highlights the potential of machine learning to refine postoperative pain management strategies in obstetric care, suggesting that personalized approaches, particularly incorporating esketamine and specific anesthesia methods, could enhance patient outcomes.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMachine LearningPain ManagementPostoperative PainAdultAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledFemaleHumansKetaminePregnancyKetamineEsketamineMachine learningPain managementPost-cesarean painSHAP values

Identifiers

PMID40211131
PMCPMC11983914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.