ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting post-cesarean pain and individualized pain management strategies: a multicenter study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicenter study on the prediction model for chronic low back pain after lumbar decompression surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus: integration of metabolic and paraspinal muscle features.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- A Gamified Pain Management Intervention for Adults With Chronic Pain in Mainland China: Single-Arm Pre-Post Pilot Study With Machine Learning Predictive Modeling.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Mindfulness Meditation Combined with eCASH-Based Nursing for Cesarean Section in Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Study on Perioperative Pain and Recovery.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Personalized Multimodal and Opioid-Sparing Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management: Enhancing Recovery and Addressing the Post-Discharge Gap.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Analysis of Key Driving Factors for Inpatient Service Experience in Obstetrics and Gynecology Specialized Hospitals Based on Random Forest Algorithm.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective management of postoperative pain remains a significant challenge in obstetric care due to the variability in pain perception and response influenced by physical, medical, and psychosocial factors. Current standardized pain management protocols often fail to accommodate this variability, necessitating more tailored approaches.
objectiveThis study aims to improve postoperative pain management following cesarean sections by developing personalized protocols using machine learning (ML) models.
methodThe study analyzed the efficacy of eight ML models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, and Neural Networks, using data from two distinct hospital cohorts. Performance metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R²) were evaluated through internal and external validations. SHAP value analysis was used to identify key predictors influencing pain management outcomes.
resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest RMSE and highest R². Key factors impacting pain management included esketamine use, anesthesia method, and anesthetic drug type, with esketamine significantly delaying the first activation of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).
conclusionsThe study highlights the potential of machine learning to refine postoperative pain management strategies in obstetric care, suggesting that personalized approaches, particularly incorporating esketamine and specific anesthesia methods, could enhance patient outcomes.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.