ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Location of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography impacts fluoroscopy time: a multi-institutional retrospective study at tertiary academic centers.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is important in the management of pancreatobiliary diseases and requires fluoroscopy resulting in radiation exposure to those involved. ERCP is performed in different hospital settings such as the endoscopy unit (EU), radiology suite (RS), and operating room (OR) depending on numerous factors. Our study examines the differences in duration of fluoroscopy time (FT) as a surrogate for radiation dosages between multiple unique settings.
methodsA retrospective cohort analysis at multiple tertiary academic centers was performed on 3251 ERCPs performed between April 2015 to November 2021. FT was compared between multiple locations, between different fluoroscopy device operators, and between normal working hours versus after hours.
resultsOf the 3228 included patients, 54.8% (n = 1768) patients had an exam in the EU, 37.9% (n = 1223) RS or 7.3% (n = 237) or OR respectively. The average FT in the EU, RS, and OR was 6.0 min, 3.5 min, and 4.1 min respectively. The average FT of the EU was significantly more than the RS, OR, and RS and OR together. The average FT of the cases in the OR was significantly less than cases done outside of the OR (5.0 min). FT during working hours (5.0 min) was significantly longer than FT outside of working hours (3.3 min).
conclusionsFT in the EU was longer than in the OR and RS. Locations in which ERCPs were performed by the endoscopist had a longer average FT than those with technician-controlled fluoroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.