Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211093›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

Predicting experiences of paranoia and auditory verbal hallucinations in daily life with ambulatory sensor data - A feasibility study.

Felix Strakeljahn, Tania M Lincoln, Björn Schlier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix StrakeljahnClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Movement Sciences, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7803-4401
Tania M LincolnClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Movement Sciences, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-2440
Björn SchlierClinical Child and Adolescent Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9533-1819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction models that can detect the onset of psychotic experiences are a key component of developing Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAI). Building these models on passively collectable data could substantially reduce user burden. In this study, we developed prediction models to detect experiences of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) and paranoia using ambulatory sensor data and assessed their stability over 12 weeks.

methodsFourteen individuals diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder participated in a 12-day Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study. They wore ambulatory sensors measuring autonomic arousal (i.e., electrodermal activity, heart rate variability) and completed questionnaires assessing the intensity/distress of AVHs and paranoia once every hour. After 12 weeks, participants repeated the EMA for four days for a follow-up assessment. We calculated prediction models to detect AVHs, paranoia, and AVH-/paranoia-related distress using random forests within nested cross-validation. Calculated prediction models were applied to the follow-up data to assess the stability of prediction models.

resultsPrediction models calculated with physiological data achieved high accuracy both for AVH (81%) and paranoia (69%-75%). Accuracy increased by providing models with baseline information about psychotic symptom levels (AVH: 86%; paranoia: 80%-85%). During the follow-up EMA accuracy dropped slightly throughout all models but remained high (73%-84%).

conclusionsRelying solely on physiological data to detect psychotic symptoms achieved substantial accuracy that remained sufficiently stable over 12 weeks. Experiences of AVHs can be predicted with higher accuracy and long-term stability than paranoia. The findings tentatively suggest that psychophysiology-based prediction models could be used to develop and enhance JITAIs for psychosis.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentHallucinationsMonitoring, AmbulatoryParanoid DisordersSchizophreniaAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersYoung AdultEMAJITAImachine learningpsychosissymptom prediction

Identifiers

PMID40211093
PMCPMC12094635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.