Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211092›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025

A working group report from the 2024 National Cancer Institute / Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee endometrial cancer clinical trials planning meeting: refining the approach to endometrial cancer in the immunotherapy era.

Casey M Cosgrove, Dmitriy Zamarin, Jose R Conejo-Garcia, Kari E Hacker, Roberto Vargas, Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos, Haider S Mahdi, Stephanie Gaillard, Stephanie Markovina, Elise C Kohn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Casey M CosgroveDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecologic, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-1056-9938
Dmitriy ZamarinDepartment of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0094-0161
Jose R Conejo-GarciaDepartment of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-4074
Kari E HackerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-5116
Roberto VargasDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-7824
Panagiotis A KonstantinopoulosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-1479
Haider S MahdiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Magee Women's Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Stephanie GaillardKelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2174-3693
Stephanie MarkovinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.
Elise C KohnCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-9762
Sarah F AdamsDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.

Funding

Clinical Trials Planning MeetingNCI Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is now the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the United States. Recognizing the urgent need to improve outcomes for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, the National Cancer Institute Gynecologic Cancer Steering Committee convened a clinical trials planning meeting, Refining the Approach to Endometrial Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era, on January 8 and 9, 2024. Multidisciplinary experts were charged with addressing critical challenges to optimize treatment of endometrial cancer in the new immunotherapy landscape. As part of the clinical trials planning meeting, working groups were assembled to address several important aspects of clinical trial design. Working group 1 focused on translational science and was tasked with reviewing the scientific literature for data on validated discriminants of response to immunotherapy to inform trial concept development by the therapy-focused groups. The working group established that molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer is now the standard approach for classifying endometrial tumors. Molecular subtyping for prognostic and predictive applications should be considered when assessing biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets. Additionally, strategies to improve immune response like incorporation of radiation as well as therapy sequencing considerations should continue to be explored. A major key observation from working group 1 was lack of validated discriminants for immunotherapy response beyond mismatch repair status, and tumor mutational burden and exploration of additional discriminants of response and resistance will be critical with the increasing use of immunotherapy in endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsImmunotherapyBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID40211092
PMCPMC12756984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.