ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neural models for detection and classification of brain states and transitions.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exploring natural or pharmacologically induced brain dynamics, such as sleep, wakefulness, or anesthesia, provides rich functional models for studying brain states. These models allow detailed examination of unique spatiotemporal neural activity patterns that reveal brain function. However, assessing transitions between brain states remains computationally challenging. Here we introduce a pipeline to detect brain states and their transitions in the cerebral cortex using a dual-model Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a self-supervised autoencoder-based multimodal clustering algorithm. This approach distinguishes brain states such as slow oscillations, microarousals, and wakefulness with high confidence. Using chronic local field potential recordings from rats, our method achieved a global accuracy of 91%, with up to 96% accuracy for certain states. For the transitions, we report an average accuracy of 74%. Our models were trained using a leave-one-out methodology, allowing for broad applicability across subjects and pre-trained models for deployments. It also features a confidence parameter, ensuring that only highly certain cases are automatically classified, leaving ambiguous cases for the multimodal unsupervised classifier or further expert review. Our approach presents a reliable and efficient tool for brain state labeling and analysis, with applications in basic and clinical neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.