ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting global educational inequality with a hierarchical belief rule base model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Belief Rule Base Modeling of Complex Industrial Systems Based on Sigmoid Functions.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A student academic performance prediction model based on the interval belief rule base.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global educational inequality is influenced by socio-economic development, especially in low-income and conflict-affected regions. Predicting such inequality allows researchers and policymakers to design better education policies and resource allocation strategies. The Belief Rule Base (BRB) is used as an interpretable model that incorporates expert knowledge, making it suitable for these predictions. However, BRBs face challenges, including rule explosion due to excessive feature information and a lack of standardized hierarchical modeling. In addition, parameters in optimization processes are often influenced by randomness, causing them to deviate from expert knowledge, which reduces interpretability. To address these issues, we adopt the interpretable hierarchical confidence rule base (HBRB-I) model, which enables self-organized construction of hierarchical structures through a multilayer tree structure (MTS), and a new optimization scheme to improve accuracy while retaining interpretability. Experimental results show that the HBRB-I model achieves high accuracy and robustness in predicting global educational inequality, which also provides data support for equitable and sustainable distribution of global educational resources. The interpretability of the model allows policymakers to develop forward-looking education policies that are aligned with sustainable development goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.