Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Floral reward traits change between sexual phases in two Helleborus species.

Aneta Sulborska-Różycka, Bożena Denisow, Monika Strzałkowska-Abramek, Katarzyna Jaśkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aneta Sulborska-RóżyckaDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St, Lublin, 20 - 950, Poland.
Bożena DenisowDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St, Lublin, 20 - 950, Poland. bozena.denisow@up.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-7496
Monika Strzałkowska-AbramekDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka St, Lublin, 20 - 950, Poland.
Katarzyna JaśkiewiczThe National Institute of Horticultural Research, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, Skierniewice, 96 - 100, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nectar and pollen attractants as well as visitors in Helleborus viridis ssp. viridis and H. purpurascens (Ranunculaceae), i.e. European species, were studied during two flowering seasons. The long-lived flowers of these species are characterized by long nectar availability lasting 15-17 days, i.e. until the end of pollen presentation. On average, approx. 2-fold more nectar and sugar mass was available in the flowers of H. viridis ssp. viridis compared to H. purpurascens. Both species are protogynous, having an initial female phase lasting for 3 days. The nectar and sugar mass was consistently male-biased. At the end of the flower's life span, the nectar mass and the sugar concentration decreased considerably. In both species, sucrose predominated in the nectar, which also contained small quantities of other disaccharides (maltose and trehalose) and monosaccharides (glucose and fructose). The chemical composition of the nectar sugar varied between the sexual phases; sucrose in the female-phase nectar was replaced mainly by fructose. In addition to nectar, the flowers offered pollen (between 2 and 4 and 10-17 days of anthesis). In the study area, both Helleborus species were foraged by queens of bumble bees and honey bees; however, their distribution differed between the species. Bumble bees dominated in H. viridis subsp. viridis, whereas both pollinator groups were noted with a similar frequency in H. purpurascens.

Indexed as

FlowersHelleborusAnimalsBeesPlant NectarPollenPollinationRewardPlant NectarBumble beesMale-biased nectar productionPollen productionPollen protein contentSucrose predominance in nectar

Identifiers

PMID40211022
PMCPMC11986146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.