Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
A prospective study describing splanchnic NIRS and clinical outcomes in encephalopathic neonates receiving minimal enteral nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia.
Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05471336 (A Prospective Study Describing Splanchnic NIRS Values in Infants With Neonatal Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia and Receiving Enteral Feeds), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study Describing Splanchnic NIRS Values in Infants With Neonatal Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia and Receiving Enteral Feeds
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare regional splanchnic oxygenation (SrSO2) levels and clinical outcomes between infants who received minimal enteral nutrition (MEN) during Therapeutic Hypothermia (TH), and those who did not. STUDY
designA prospective, interventional cohort study with a historic control group at two Regional Perinatal Centers (NCT05471336).
resultsParticipant demographics and clinical illness severity were similar between MEN (n = 40) and control (n = 40) groups. There were no significant safety events. SrSO2 levels were normal in both groups throughout. Subjects that received MEN experienced fewer central line days (5.8 v 6.9, p = 0.005) and higher rates of human milk feeding (77% v 46%, p = 0.010), and achieved full oral feeds sooner (9.9 v 13.4 days, p = 0.043).
conclusionSplanchnic tissue oxygenation was normal in both groups, and similar between groups throughout TH. Providing MEN during TH appears safe and effective, resulting in several important clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40210989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.