ArticleScientific reports2025
Two-dimensional trial-by-trial error correction for accurate baseball pitching.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throwing an object accurately at a target position at high-speed repeatedly is a specific human motor skill. The arrival position of the thrown ball is approximately determined by its physical state at release. In high-speed baseball pitching, reducing the variability in the ball's elevation/azimuth angle of the velocity at release (release angle) is particularly necessary to reduce the variability in the vertical/horizontal arrival position. However, as there is always variability in human movements, which increases as the speed increases, decreasing the variability is an issue. This study focused on one strategy, trial-by-trial error correction, which is to correct movements in the subsequent trials facing an undesirable outcome. Fourteen skilled baseball pitchers' intertrial changes in the elevation/azimuth release angle of 30 balls were analyzed together by transition probability analysis in addition to a separate analysis using the autocorrelation function. The results showed a difference in error correction depending on the state and direction, and Friedman's test for the transition probability from state to state showed a significant difference in the rank means [chi-squared = 25.79, df = 15, p = 0.04]. In addition, this suggests that the pitchers with large variability in the release angle made fewer corrections in the horizontal direction. These findings indicate that trial-by-trial error correction can be a strategy to decrease variability however, complicated factors are involved in error correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.