ArticleScientific reports2025
A real-world descriptive study of screening practices for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy in Japan using an insurance claims database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrast Sensitivity and Colour Vision Tests for Early Detection and Monitoring of Hydroxychloroquine Retinal Toxicity: A Preliminary Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Determinants of Baseline Ophthalmic Screening and Its Association with Long-Term Treatment Persistence in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases Initiating Hydroxychloroquine: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2015, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been widely used as a standard treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) under the national health insurance system in Japan. However, the status of routine ophthalmological screening for retinopathy, which is a notable safety concern of HCQ, remains unclear. In this retrospective study using the nationwide health insurance claims database, we aimed to investigate the status of ophthalmological screening in routine clinical practice in Japan. A total of 2567 patients with SLE or CLE were included in the analysis. The proportion of ophthalmology visits was 88.0% at the initiation of HCQ prescription, decreased to 76.3% after one year, and then remained constant. Moreover, only 50% of the patients underwent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and automated visual field (VF) tests, which are useful for the early detection of HCQ retinopathy-related changes. Importantly, the proportion of ophthalmology visits remained consistently high among patients who visited an ophthalmologist in the previous year, ranging from 77.3% to 90.2%. These findings highlight the need to improve screening adherence and promote regular ophthalmological evaluations, particularly for patients without prior ophthalmology visits, to enhance the early detection of HCQ retinopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.