ArticleScientific reports2025
Contrast and luminance dependence of target choice and visual orientation in walking stick insects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changing 3D heading direction in terrestrial locomotion: effectiveness of visual landmarks and the onset of turning in stick insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When presented with static images, animals show robust preferences for particular visual features, and reliably turn towards and approach selected visual landmarks. In target choice paradigms, stick insects tend to approach edges with high image contrast, but also show robust orientation based on luminance alone. To better understand which stimulus features actually govern turning towards static visual targets, this study tests the relative importance of two elementary cues of spatial vision - luminance and contrast. We do so in a large open-field arena, using luminance-modulated, static 360° patterns with and without high-contrast edges. We show that target choice strongly depends on image contrast, though with a bias towards areas of low luminance. Comparison of heading directions during approach with terminal locations at the arena wall suggests an early, coarse orientation based on luminance, with subsequent steering towards high-contrast regions. When walking towards a target with high-contrast edges, the likelihood to turn away towards a Gaussian distractor image increases with decreasing edge contrast of the original target. Subjective equality of the two images occurs for an approximate 2:1 weighing of contrast and luminance, indicating that a stronger contrast-dependent edge-orientation mechanism acts in parallel with a weaker luminance-dependent phototaxis mechanism. Given the significance of stick insects as study organisms for the control of legged locomotion, future research may now test whether the two visual orientation mechanisms lead to distinct turning responses at the level of step pattern or leg movement variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.