ArticleScientific data2025
Epigenomic signatures of cis-regulatory elements in the developing mouse and pig forelimb.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic regulation of vertebrate limb development: from field specification to tissue morphogenesis.Epigenetics · 2026Review
- Epigenomic signatures of cis-regulatory elements in the developing mouse and pig forelimb.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cis-regulatory elements (CREs) orchestrate the spatiotemporal regulation of key transcriptional programs. These genomic regions-including promoters, enhancers, and insulators-play a crucial role during embryonic development, and their functional diversification is thought to contribute significantly to the morphological evolution of animal body plans. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation for various histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K4me1) from equivalent developmental stages of mouse (E11.5) and pig (day 23; D23) to identify active regulatory regions during forelimb development in both species. The overlap of these epigenomic signatures with the pattern of open chromatin allowed us to classify these putative regulatory regions into different chromatin states in mouse and pig limb primordia. Our profiling of the regulatory genome in mouse and pig limb buds offers a valuable resource in the evo-devo field for exploring mechanisms underlying the morphological evolution of the tetrapod limb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.