Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210907›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantitative evaluation of flood extent detection using attention U-Net case studies from Eastern South Wales Australia in March 2021 and July 2022.

Falah Fakhri, Ioannis Gkanatsios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Falah Fakhri, Turku, Finland. falah.fakhri@outlook.com.
Ioannis Gkanatsios, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remotely sensed data have increasingly been used to improve flood mapping and modelling, providing much of the required information for delineating flood-affected areas and damage assessment. SAR satellite-based solutions have been proven to be among the most effective tools for flood extent detection because of their large spatial coverage, reasonable revisit time, and ability to penetrate through clouds and provide a full view of the Earth's surface regardless of atmospheric or lighting conditions. This research proposes an innovative approach to applying an attention U-Net on SAR datasets to detect and extract flood extent maps. The approach was developed and validated using the datasets collected during a flooding event after extreme rainfall hit the eastern coast of Australia on 18 March 2021. Sentinel-1 (S1) ground range detected (GRD) and single look complex (SLC) descending track of the pre-and post-event on the 12th and 24th of March 2021, have been pre-processed, coincide with labels area of the flood extension have been carefully delineated to feed the model. The attention U-Net approach on S1 cross-polarization of VH provided promising results to identify the flood extent with precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.90, 0.88, 0.89 correspondingly. At the same time the result of the unseen frame achieved precision, recall, and F1-score, of 0.63, 0.59, and 0.61 respectively. The approach was also successfully employed to detect flood extent over the study area in July 2022, and the proposed model gave an outstanding accuracy of over 0.84 F1-score.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAttention U-NetDeep learningFloodMachine learningRemote sensingSentinel-1

Identifiers

PMID40210907
PMCPMC11986135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.