ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized driver fatigue detection method using multimodal neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy-latency trade-offs and absent embedded validation in deep learning driver drowsiness detection: a PRISMA systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Emotion-Aware Contextual Modelling for Robust Driver Fatigue Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multimodal drowsiness dataset using video, biometric, and behavioral data.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Confidence-driven adaptive time window for real-time driver fatigue detection in Level 2-3 autonomous vehicles: a multi-dataset validation study.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Design and Validation of PACTUS 2.0: Usability for Neurological Patients, Seniors and Caregivers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of Neurophysiological Correlates of Mental Fatigue in Both Monotonous and Demanding Driving Conditions.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- TMU-Net: A Transformer-Based Multimodal Framework with Uncertainty Quantification for Driver Fatigue Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Unobtrusive Biosensing in Intelligent Vehicles: Sensors, Algorithms, and Integration Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driver fatigue is a significant factor contributing to road accidents, highlighting the need for precise and reliable detection systems. This study introduces a comprehensive approach using multimodal neural networks, leveraging the DROZY dataset, which includes physiological and facial data collected under sleep deprivation conditions. Two advanced neural network models were developed and evaluated: a multimodal feature combination model and a multimodal feature coupled model. The multimodal feature coupled model, which is the highlight of this study, uniquely integrates various data types, such as electroencephalograms (EEG), electrocardiograms (ECG), and facial images, through a sophisticated coupling mechanism. In this model, the features from different modalities are not merely combined; instead, they serve as mutual weights, influencing each other's contribution to the final prediction. This dynamic interaction between features enhances the model's ability to capture complex patterns associated with driver fatigue, leading to superior performance. The model achieved an outstanding accuracy of 98.41%, precision of 98.38%, recall of 98.39%, and an F1-score of 98.38%, demonstrating its exceptional capability in accurately detecting driver fatigue. In comparison, the multimodal feature combination model also performed well, with an accuracy of 94.87%, precision of 95.18%, recall of 95.04%, and an F1-score of 95.00%. To ensure robust decision-making in real-world applications, a majority voting strategy was employed in the decision phase, aggregating predictions from multiple classifiers to provide consistent and reliable fatigue warnings. These results highlight the advantages of the multimodal feature-coupled model in addressing the challenges of driver fatigue detection, making it a valuable tool for enhancing road safety through advanced, efficient monitoring systems in vehicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.