Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210850›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2025

Non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

Michael Alperovich, Cristiano Tonello, Linda C Mayes, Kristopher T Kahle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distraction in anterior plagiocephaly: technique, risks, and long-term results.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Is a standardised severity index needed in unicoronal craniosynostosis? Challenges in developing an objective metric.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Open surgery in lambdoid-related plagiocephaly: detailed techniques, risks, and long-term results.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive and neuropsychomotor development in craniosynostosis: an evaluation of the most affected functions.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. TheFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael AlperovichDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. michael.alperovich@yale.edu.
Cristiano TonelloHospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Linda C MayesChild Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kristopher T KahleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5922-7547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more major cranial sutures at birth or soon after. Single-suture non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is the most common form of craniosynostosis and includes the sagittal, metopic, unicoronal and unilambdoid subtypes. Characterized by an abnormal head shape specific to the fused suture type, NSC can cause increased intracranial pressure. Cranial sutures either originate from the neural crest or arise from mesoderm-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A mixture of environmental and genetic factors contributes to NSC, with genetic causes following a largely polygenic model. Physical examination is used to identify the majority of patients, but accompanying radiographic imaging can be confirmatory. The three major surgical techniques in use to treat NSC are cranial vault remodelling, strip craniectomy and spring-assisted cranioplasty. Surgical intervention is ideally performed in the first year of life, with a mortality of <1%. Health-care disparities contribute to delayed initial presentation and timely repair. Optimal timing of surgery and comparative outcomes by surgical technique remain under active study. School-age children with treated NSC on average have subtle, but lower cognitive and behavioural performance. However, patient-reported quality of life outcomes are comparable to those in control individuals.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesCranial SuturesHumansInfantQuality of Life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.