ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025
Key considerations for applying intersectionality theory to partner and stakeholder engagement in public health.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping intersectionality in dementia care research: a decadal scoping review.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Pooled it
- Respecting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Pluralism and Human Rights in Civil Society.Transcultural psychiatry · 2026Article
- Co-design values: public health perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingPartner and stakeholder engagement (PSE) in public health that involves tokenistic and performative practices results in further marginalization of priority populations. Inclusive, intentional, and mutually respectful engagement requires an intersectional approach to account for the overlapping and compounding impacts of multiple systems of power on the lived experiences of priority populations. However, there is a lack of practical guidance on methods, strategies, or approaches for how public health initiatives can meaningfully engage with priority populations.
interventionAn evidence synthesis on intersectional approaches to PSE in public health was conducted to inform the development of an evidence-informed tool. Engagement approaches were evaluated based on (1) integration of intersectionality, as defined by the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework and (2) level of stakeholder engagement achieved, from communication to co-production. OUTCOMES: The resulting tool offers "key considerations" for incorporating intersectionality principles in PSE in public health, encouraging critical reflection on the who, why, and how of PSE. Organized by the development, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation phases of public health initiatives, these considerations guide users through critical reflection by posing open-ended questions. IMPLICATIONS: The tool's "key considerations" are relevant for all public health practitioners, with an emphasis on those in public health institutions. It guides users in navigating structural and interpersonal power imbalances with systemically marginalized priority populations. Adopting an intersectional lens enhances the ability to identify and address the complex array of determinants of health, tailored to population-specific needs and priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.