ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Angiogenesis: Biological Mechanisms and In Vitro Models.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The translation of biomedical devices and drug research is an expensive and long process with a low probability of receiving FDA approval. Developing physiologically relevant in vitro models with human cells offers a solution to not only improving the odds of FDA approval but also to expand our ability to study complex in vivo systems in a simpler fashion. Animal models remain the standard for pre-clinical testing; however, the data from animal models is an unreliable extrapolation when anticipating a human response in clinical trials, thus contributing to the low rates of translation. In this review, we focus on in vitro vascular or angiogenic models because of the incremental role that the vascular system plays in the translation of biomedical research. The first section of this review discusses the most common angiogenic cytokines that are used in vitro to initiate angiogenesis, followed by angiogenic inhibitors where both initiators and inhibitors work to maintain vascular homeostasis. Next, we evaluate previously published in vitro models, where we evaluate capturing the physical environment for biomimetic in vitro modeling. These topics provide a foundation of parameters that must be considered to improve and achieve vascular biomimicry. Finally, we summarize these topics to suggest a path forward with the goal of engineering human in vitro models that emulate the in vivo environment and provide a platform for biomedical device and drug screening that produces data to support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40210793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.