ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Differential effects of task difficulty on target-type switching in haptic foraging: Evidence for increased switching with extreme task demands.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated how varying difficulty levels modulate haptic foraging performance and search behavior. Thirty-three blindfolded participants had to locate and remove 20 target objects within three conditions - easy feature, conjunction, and hard feature - defined by target-distractor similarity. Response times and target-type switching were measured, and errors were recorded but remained very low across all conditions. Results revealed that higher task difficulty was associated with longer response times. Although participants switched between target types frequently in both the easy and the hard feature conditions, they switched significantly less often in the conjunction condition. This suggests that tasks requiring multiple feature dimensions to distinguish targets from distractors elicit more top-down-driven sequential searching, whereas distinctly defined targets permit more frequent shifts driven by salient cues. Practice effects emerged as participants performed each condition faster when they had already practiced different search conditions. These findings show that haptic search behavior, like visual foraging, is shaped by the interplay of top-down and bottom-up processes. They further highlight that tactile and visual systems may share common representational pathways and that practical considerations, such as target similarity and prior experience, play a crucial role in task efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.