Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210780›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

ETAD: a case series of endoscopic transanastomotic drainage of anastomotic leak by colonoscopy.

Saher-Zahra Khan, Meridith Ginesi, Jennifer L Miller-Ocuin, Emily Steinhagen, Trevor Teetor, Brooke Glessing, Meagan Costedio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saher-Zahra Khan *Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Meridith Ginesi *Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Jennifer L Miller-OcuinDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Emily SteinhagenDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Trevor TeetorDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Brooke GlessingDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Meagan CostedioDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Meagan.costedio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9620-2477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal drain placement is the preferred treatment for coloanal and low colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL). Endoscopic placement of double-pigtail stents (DPS) has been described sparingly in the colorectal literature for more proximal AL. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of endoscopic transanastomotic drain (ETAD) placement in leaks after colorectal surgery.

methodsThis is a case series of 12 patients who underwent ETAD placement for AL (12 patients) between May 2020 and July 2023. Patients with contained leaks were treated with ETAD if they were hemodynamically stable without peritonitis. Outcomes we evaluated included length of stay, need for readmission, need for reoperation, duration of drain placement, and reversal of diverting stomas.

resultsOf the 12 patients, 5 were female and had a median age of 63. Indications for index surgery included diverticulitis (n = 9), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 1), rectal cancer (n = 1), and uncertain diagnosis (n = 1). 5 patients had stomas created (loop ileostomies,) at the index operation. Leaks were identified a median of 80 days (range 9-211) for diverted patients and a median of 15 days (range 5-18) for non-diverted patients. At the time of ETAD, three patients required readmission, four patients remained admitted from index operation, and five patients were treated as outpatients. All diverting loop ileostomies were reversed. The median duration of ETAD was 55 days (range 38-115 days). All were successfully managed with ETAD; no patients required revision of their anastomoses or new diverting stoma.

conclusionsEndoscopic DPS placement into contained colorectal leaks was successful in promoting healing and avoiding reoperation in 100% of our patients. All ostomies but one have been reversed. Larger studies are necessary to evaluate safety and efficacy, long-term outcomes, and the appropriate patient population for consideration.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakColonoscopyDrainageAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesStentsAnastomotic leakColorectal surgerySurgical endoscopyTransanastomotic drain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.