ReviewCardiovascular engineering and technology2025
Temporary Pacing for Electric Cardiac Stimulation and Neuromodulatory Cardiovascular Therapy.
Review in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread prevalence and significant consequences of cardiac arrhythmias have been addressed by adopting cardiac stimulation and neuromodulation implantable devices. The oldest, most commonly employed, and most well-known technology is the permanent transvenous cardiac pacemaker. However, in select emergent clinical scenarios and transient pathologies, temporary pacing is preferred. More recently, neuromodulatory vagal nerve stimulation has emerged to address neurologic, psychiatric, and nociceptive pathologies, generating significant clinical and scientific interest in the invention of temporary corollary devices for a subset of indications of nociceptive origin. The dominance of particular implant approaches and anatomic targets in both temporary pacing and neuromodulation in the clinic is owed to capabilities and limitations present in the current technological landscape. However, recent innovations in industry and academia may lead to a fundamental shift in how temporary pacing and neuromodulation are delivered in terms of procedural approach and patient outcomes. In this review, we present an overview of contemporary temporary pacemakers, neuromodulatory therapies, and devices, highlighting novel temporary pacing technologies from the clinic, industry, and academia, such as temporary permanent pacemakers, innovations in non-blood-contacting devices, bioresorbable pacemakers, and advances in neuromodulatory approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.