ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Comparative analysis of the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes on cartilage regeneration: exploring their synergistic potential with hyaluronic acid for treating articular cartilage defects.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MSC-EVs in Cartilage Regeneration and Immunomodulation: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects for Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Membrane lipid order predicts potency decline in therapeutic extracellular vesicles following handling, storage, and reconstitution stress.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Exosomal Interventions in Bone and Osteochondral Repair: Mechanisms and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeArticular cartilage exhibits a low regenerative capacity and limited potential for self-renewal. Recent research has demonstrated that exosomes and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) significantly enhance cartilage repair by promoting cellular proliferation, increasing extracellular matrix synthesis, and modulating the immune response. Additionally, hyaluronic acid (HA), a critical component of synovial fluid, plays a key role in facilitating cell migration. This study aims to compare the regenerative effects of Wharton's jelly-derived MSCs, MSC-derived exosomes, and their combination with hyaluronic acid in the treatment of cartilage defects. Additionally, we seek to evaluate the impact of hyaluronic acid when combined with MSCs and exosomes through histological analysis in a rat model.
methodsIn this study, full-thickness cartilage defects were created in the trochlear grooves of both distal femurs in 48 adult rats. The knees were randomly assigned to six groups: Group I: Control-saline, Group II: Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), Group III: Wharton's jelly MSC-derived exosomes (Exo), Group IV: Hyaluronic acid (HA), Group V: MSC and HA combination, and Group VI: Exo and HA combination. Each rat received a total of three intra-articular injections at weekly intervals, beginning two weeks post-surgery. Four weeks following the final injection, all rats were euthanized, and their femurs were dissected for analysis. All groups were assessed macroscopically using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scoring system, following histological staining with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and toluidine blue, and immunohistochemical staining with type II collagen antibodies. The quality of the repaired cartilage was subsequently evaluated according to the ICRS histological grading system by an independent, blinded observer.
resultsMacroscopic evaluations indicated that the ICRS scores of the MSC group (8.2 ± 0.7) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of the control group (4.3 ± 0.7). The cartilage defects in the MSC group showed substantial repair, displaying the most effective cartilage regeneration among all groups. Furthermore, comparison between groups revealed that both the MSC and Exo groups demonstrated a higher rate of defect depth repair, a smaller demarcation border, and a smoother cartilage surface.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that exosomes are as effective as stem cell therapies in promoting cartilage repair, suggesting that exosomes may serve as a viable alternative to cell-based therapies for cartilage damage. However, the addition of hyaluronic acid to stem cells and exosomes showed no significant enhancement in cartilage repair. Our findings highlight a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of osteochondral cartilage defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40210743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.