Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210721›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2025

Preference for advance care planning in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Kazuki Tobita, Hayato Sakamoto, Takumi Inami, Daisuke Fujisawa, Kaori Takeuchi, Hanako Kikuchi, Ayumi Goda, Kyoko Soejima, Takashi Kohno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kazuki TobitaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Medical Care, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Hayato SakamotoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takumi InamiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Daisuke FujisawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori TakeuchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Hanako KikuchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Ayumi GodaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Kyoko SoejimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan.
Takashi KohnoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8611, Japan. kohno-ta@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Grants-In-Aid for Scientific Research 20K08408Grants-In-Aid for Scientific Research 23K07584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing advance care planning (ACP) is recommended in clinical guidelines. However, in pulmonary hypertension, patients' preference toward ACP remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the preference of patients with pulmonary hypertension for ACP conversations and the association of ACP with important patient factors underlying treatment decision-making. We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study, assessing patients' preferred and actual participation in ACP conversations, as well as important patient factors underlying their treatment decision-making (including prognosis; patient values; physician recommendation; and symptom, financial, family, and social burdens). Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify patients with positive attitudes toward ACP conversations. Of 133 patients with pulmonary hypertension (median age, 60 years; mean pulmonary arterial pressure, 23 mmHg; female, 71.4%), 78.2% recognized the importance of ACP conversations. Regarding the patients' perception of appropriate ACP timing, 37.8% chose after repeated hospitalizations for worsening pulmonary hypertension and 22.4% chose during readmission for worsening pulmonary hypertension. Among these, 40.8% engaged in ACP conversations. A positive attitude toward ACP conversations was associated with marital status (married), having children, better oxygenation, and patients' preference toward physician recommendations in pulmonary hypertension treatment decision-making, but not with age, pulmonary hypertension etiology, or other patient preferences in treatment decision-making. Most patients with pulmonary hypertension preferred ACP conversations. A positive attitude toward ACP was associated with patients' preference toward physicians' recommendations in pulmonary hypertension treatment decision-making. Further research is required to establish an appropriate ACP approach that aligns with patient preference and physician recommendations for this patient population.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningHypertension, PulmonaryPatient PreferenceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance care planningCross-sectionalPatient preferencePulmonary hypertensionTreatment decision-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.